Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- UC:Use cases (section railML® Use Cases)page you learn what is a use case and find a list of railML® use cases. While the emphasis of the railML®-wiki lies in documenting single elements in a bottom-up7 KB (287 words) - 15:43, 8 April 2024
- IS:crossing (category Infrastructure Elements)as its part. Refer to the guide (link to the railML® website) for the extended tutorial. 1 <infrastructure id="is_01"> 2 <topology> 3 <netElements> 4 <netElement19 KB (1,743 words) - 14:38, 11 April 2024
- IS:line (category Infrastructure Elements)</functionalInfrastructure> </infrastructure> The railway line is owned by the infrastructure manager referenced via the attribute @infrastructureManagerRef9 KB (873 words) - 14:24, 11 April 2024
- asset <crossing> from the infrastructure part. <branchUpLeft> – This the reference to the underlying track element in infrastructure forming its upper left15 KB (1,510 words) - 19:13, 14 February 2022
- IS:mileageChange (category Infrastructure Elements)element does not appear in railML® 3.1 within the IS subschema. It is available only in railML® 3.2. Do not hesitate to contact railML.org for further questions2 KB (228 words) - 13:18, 17 April 2024
- UC:IS:RailwayInfrastructureVisualisation (section Interference with other railML® schemas / Interferenz mit anderen railML®-Schemen)The resulting changes to the planned infrastructure shall be fed back into a visualization software. The infrastructure data to be modified contains railway2 KB (180 words) - 13:43, 13 March 2023
- of RailTopoModel®, railML® 3.1 allows to define <netElement> elements with a certain length. This extension is based on the assumption that railML topology11 KB (1,110 words) - 09:59, 29 April 2024
- UC:IS:RailwayInfrastructureRecording (section Interference with other railML® schemas / Interferenz mit anderen railML®-Schemen)railway infrastructure data in an economical, fast and accurate way. Information about the track geometry, topology and related infrastructure elements3 KB (335 words) - 13:48, 13 March 2023
- by one of the railML® working groups (link to the railML® website) or suggested by anyone through a post in the forum (link to the railML® website). If4 KB (579 words) - 16:49, 13 March 2023
- also possible to locate the crossing at tracks 30 and 27 in railML® 3. According to in the railML® 2 wiki, the navigability of straight branches is described29 KB (2,876 words) - 14:34, 13 March 2024
- Dev:Simple crossing (section Comparison with railML® 2)@passable=“true” is not defined. In railML® 3 navigability is defined explicitly by a corresponding attribute. In railML® 2 <crossing> is used to describe24 KB (2,447 words) - 14:36, 13 March 2024
- Dev:Railway switch (section Comparison with railML® 2)@applicationDirection railML® 3. The orientation of a switch in railML® 2 was always dependent on the direction of the track. In railML® 3 the directions specified18 KB (2,052 words) - 18:20, 15 April 2024
- UC:TT:FGIInTrain (section Interference with other railML® schemas / Interferenz mit anderen railML®-Schemen)train correctly to the other information <ocp> elements to refer to the infrastructure Different levels of complexity of the data import are possible. a minimal9 KB (677 words) - 18:10, 27 June 2022
- required for railML® 3.2 and higher. For all versions of railML® 2 plus for railML® 3.1, the proposed means are xs:any, xs:anyAttribute and rail:tOtherEnumerationValue18 KB (2,309 words) - 14:28, 1 August 2022