Search results

Very many railML® elements require an id attribute of the W3C-Type xs:ID. This has to be provided in order to enable references, that are very much used

Main Menu   Subschemas Infrastructure Interlocking Rollingstock Timetable (Common) (Codelists) XML tree UML diagrams Use cases Versions & Changes

(link to the railML® website) but happens in short terms. Inform the railML® common coordinator about a missing, incomplete or faulty entry — see https://www

handling and XML catalogs regarding named and unnamed tools to Common coordinator . Back to Common overview

Main Menu   Subschemas Infrastructure Interlocking Rollingstock Timetable (Common) (Codelists) XML tree UML diagrams Use cases Versions & Changes

and codelists allows actualizing the codelists in very short cycles. The concept of codelists is explained here. The container element is named <registers>

generic attributes and elements. (lines 37-48) This example has many in common with the previous one. See those comments, too. The following XML instance

and codelists allows actualizing the codelists in very short cycles. The concept of codelists is explained here. The list contains train protection systems

and codelists allows actualizing the codelists in very short cycles. The concept of codelists is explained here. The codelist consists of clearance gauge

the code attribute of the following elements: Common subschema <infrastructureManager> railML® 3 Common subschema <infrastructureManager> <organizationalUnit>

Common concepts to all railML® 3 schemas   Dev: is a pseudo namespace to cover general aspects or aspects interfering different subschemas. Some general

does not need to be a real XSD file with the definition. However, it is common to publish the namespace definition using an XSD file. In the sense of data

already clear and can be exchanged while only a few details need adding. This common scenario often led to the implementation of extensions that allow adding

*.xml or *.railml, that is the question. The answer is: Both. It was not a convention from the beginning, but best practice should be: *.railml shall only

reference to the related infrastructure element is a common part of all moveable elements. Other common elements and attributes for each moveable element

consequently shall be modelled in the <common> domain: <common id="co_01"> <positioning> ... </positioning> </common> The railway network topology defined

IS root element — IS use cases — Concepts & examples The railML® Infrastructure subschema is focused on the description of the railway network infrastructure

possible specification of vehicle families and individual vehicles using the common features of the family different level of detail for data vehicle as black

elements in a bottom-up approach, we also try to help users to capture the concepts of railML® via examples and use cases in a top down approach. A use case

Modells und Austauschformates gegeben werden. An extended example, which shows common elements of railway operation that are used in data management and data