Dev:identities

From railML 3 Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

railML® Identities

Very many railML® elements require an id attribute of the W3C-Type Template:RailMLType.

This has to be provided in order to enable references, that are very much used within the railML® schemas.

On the other hand, software tools may refer to certain railML® elements, that are not referred to within the railML® file.

Semantics

The general railML® description states the following semantics for this attribute.

Template:InheritId

Constraints

The general railML® description states the following contraints.

Template:InheritIdConstraints

Export of railML® files

Software tools, which create railML® files, are free to define id values according to the above mentioned constraints.

Recommendation

railML® recommends using generic values, e.g.

<operationalPoint id="d2e717">...

or serial numbers with letter prefixes, e.g.

<operationalPoint id="op0002">...

or UUID's (on Wiki banner.png), e.g.

<operationalPoint id="04b6f736-23f7-429c-be8a-e286172de2c1">...

Please note: a Nil UUID (on Wiki banner.png) shall not be used; UUID's Version 4 (on Wiki banner.png) is commonly used.

Bad style

Sometimes exporting software tools create id values, that contain semantic data, like names, designators, train numbers or vehicle family codes.

<operationalPoint id="op-TDM">
  <name name="Tidmouth" language="en-UK"/>
  <designator register="_NWR" entry="TDM"/>
  ...

Please use some more generic coding style in order to not invite the importing software to parse the id values!

Wrong style

Rufzeichen.png If the semantic information is only included in the id, the importing software has to parse the id value in order to use it.
<operationalPoint id="op-TDM">...

This coding style hinders interoperability!

Please use a generic coding style for the id value. Look for appropriate railML® attributes in the element and put the semantics there. Otherwise use the xs:anyAttribute mechanism.

The use of this Wrong style prevents certification of the export interface.

Import of railML® files

Recommendation

Software tools, which consume railML® files, should take the id values only for referencing issues.

In case of valid railML® files, no problems will occur.

Good style

In case of consuming "good or bad styled" id values the importing software provides routines for getting the semantics from better fitting attributes.

In case of consuming "wrong styled" id values the importing software is required to parse the attribute content for getting the semantics.

That way, the most robust import interface is assured.

Wrong style

Rufzeichen.png The importing software expects to parse the id value with a special regular expression in order to get the coded semantics.

That way, "good styled" id values can't be imported!


The use of this Wrong style prevents certification of the import interface.

Differentiation from other indications

Many elements that come with an attribute id will also have the child element <name>, with attributes name and description.

  • name: A short, human readable Identifier. Uniqueness is not required.
  • description: Human readable text that gives details. Uniqueness is not required.
Birne.png Please be aware that human-readable attributes are only intended to forward simple remarks/explanations from one end-user to another end-user. They are not to be used to contain computer-processable data, nor shall it be parsed by programmes in any way. In case of semantical overlaps or discrepancies to machine processable file contents, any machine processable contents have priority over possible human interpretable contents. However, these attributes may be used to transmit complementary details to machine processable parameters.

Bitte, berücksichtigen Sie, dass menschenlesbare Attribute nur für einfache Kommentare/Erklärungen von Endbenutzer zu Endbenutzer bestimmt sind. Sie sind nicht für maschineninterpretierbare Daten gedacht und werden nicht geparst. Im Falle semantischer Überschneidungen oder Widersprüche zu maschinenlesbaren Inhalten wird diesen der Vorzug gegenüber durch Menschen lesbaren gegeben. Allerdings können durch Menschen lesbare Felder für Ergänzungen zu maschinenlesbaren verwendet werden.